&&& Platform is The New Centre's publishing platform, both online and in print, that fosters new forms of knowledge production, circulation, and consumption. It bridges the distinction between academic and popular realms, providing a more accessible platform for public intellectual practice.
Publications have no mandatory thematic or formal constraints. We view the editing process as a means to collaborate with authors, expanding and promoting their ideas, whether within the context of one of our Seminars or about topics beyond our institutional scope and mandate.
If you wish to submit a paper or have any questions regarding the submission process, please don't hesitate to contact our Editorial Team at editors@thenewcentre.org.
To read some of our published texts or purchase our books, please
visit &&& Platform.
INCREDIBLE MACHINES 2022: THE MODEL IS THE MESSAGE
| ABSTRACTS | PROGRAM | SPONSORS | PARTICIPATE |
The New Centre for Research & Practice
, in collaboration with Richmond Art Gallery, will host the Incredible Machines 2022: Model Is the Message on October 1 and 2, 2022. If you want to purchase the book containing the proceedings of this conference, please visit THIS LINK.
BACKGROUND: The original Incredible Machines conference was a two-day live, in person and online gathering on March 7-8, 2014, in Vancouver, Canada. Conceived as a transdisciplinary event for discussions about the transformative role of computational technologies, it brought together a large group of thinkers and artists in a new presentational format that challenged conventional thinking about technology inside and outside the world of contemporary art. Organized by Mohammad Salemy and Access Gallery, Incredible Machines 2014 was the first academic conference with both online and IRL presentations. It featured guest speakers and a sizable audience from different parts of the world and set the stage for the establishment of The New Centre for Research & Practice in the following September as an online platform with year-round programming dedicated to the questions of technology and futurity, now in its 9th year of operation.
DESCRIPTION: While keeping the discussions of the original event in the rearview mirror, the Incredible Machines 2022 will be looking at the technological developments of the last decade in the broadest sense, especially those with ontological roots in scientific, social, cultural, and political technologies. Our current epoch is marked by techno-capitalism's instrumental logic and unsatiated thirst for human attention, leaving less and less time for us to produce, contemplate, or even value original and extensive explanations, reflections, and critiques of the existing world.
If the declining value of meaningful content in the postwar world was summarized by Marshall McLuhan's famous words that "the Medium is the Message," today we are confronted with a changing world in which, according to the Philosophers of Technology Benjamin Bratton and the computer engineer Blaise Agüera y Arcas, "The Model is the Message." Can a shift from the medium to modeling enable us to circumvent observations and critiques to instead arrive at alternative modes of operation that bring forth consequential interventions in the world?
Models are characterized by their deep foothold in the techno-scientific world and their prevalent role in executing tasks. They emblemize the interplays and tradeoffs between representational fidelity and practical constraints. Models not only signify the friction between our theoretical and practical resources versus reality but also navigate conflicts and conformities between various theoretical and practical frameworks.
In this sense, models are not mere idealizations, useful fictions, or indirect ways of talking or acting upon the world but encapsulations of know-whats and know-hows inherent to theoretical and practical commitments pertaining to framing and unframing the world, namely knowing and acting upon it. Given their entanglement with the suppositions and partialities—whether implicit or explicit—embedded in theoretical and practical frameworks, models can either reveal or surreptitiously carry and reinforce these elements. They create what is often called black box systems or black box societies in which programmatic schemes of operations have been not only automated but kept away from our awareness and intervention.
Incredible Machines 2022 will also examine the possibility that the fields of design and architecture via model making can function today as a space of refuge for artists and thinkers to embed their own descriptive and critical observations directly as speculative yet practical and implementable models. This approach might allow us to reformulate the function of models not just as developmental blueprints but as technologies to protect innovative ideas for their future access and implementation.
Incredible Machines 2022 is conceived as a space for experimenting with new ideas through meaningful interactions between conference guests and researchers from multiple fields of knowledge. Thus, the number of attendants will be limited, and observers will be shortlisted based on their research interests and fields of practice.
If you are interested in being an observer, please complete this form, and we will contact you soon with instructions for attending the conference.
Incredible Machines 2022: Model Is the Message: October 1–2
IMAGE: Modulating Ramp, Justin Lincoln, 2022
Organized by The New Centre for Research & Practice & The Centre for Philosophy of Education at the Institute of Education, University College London
Keynote speakers: Amanda Beech, Ray Brassier, Vanessa Wills.
VIEW & DOWNLOAD CONFERENCE SCHEDULE & ABSTRACTS
TO ATTEND, PLEASE VISIT OUR EVENTBRITE PAGE
We live in a time of a renewed interest in Marx and in Marxism. Marx is now being read as having an ecological critique of capitalism, as being keenly interested in non-Western societies, and as having recognized the ambiguity of technology for human liberation. The successors of value-form theory have advanced the issue of abstract domination. New theories of class, and of ideology are also on the rise, foregrounding the friction between what is and what appears. Interest in Marx’s political thought is revived in tactically and strategically oriented theories of political organization. In tandem with this, the logics of the social world are pluralized in recent works, enabling a new understanding of social form, its compulsory character, the traction of the mode of production on the constitution of subjectivities, and the role of real abstraction. Psychoanalytic theories of the unconscious find in the concept of estrangement a common ground with Hegel and Marx, ushering in a new wave of Freud and Lacan influenced Marxism. Lively debates about the nature of abstract labor, discuss its historical and logical sources, and compatible theories of transition. The "communist hypothesis" finds new formulations.
This renaissance in serious readings of Marx parallels the rise of the so-called "Pittsburgh School" (Sellars, McDowell, Brandom, etc.) of analytic, neo-pragmatist philosophy. While the rejection of German Idealism might be seen as a foundational gesture in early analytic philosophy, the Pittsburgh School has revived interest in Kantian and Hegelian themes within a broadly naturalistic context. If previous forms of Analytic Marxism (Cohen, Elster, Roehmer) remained faithful to the analytic rejection of dialectics, the Pittsburgh School enables the recasting of Hegelian thought within a new form of semantic holism. The Pittsburgh School advances understandings of human action that problematize both "the causal" and "the normative" (and the relationship between them) in ways that could inform Marxist understandings of "the natural" and "the social." It activates conceptual tools from pragmatism, emphasizing the dimension of practice in concept use- offering possible new understandings of "praxis." It thinks through the dimension of concept-revision and world pictures, offering tools for developing more precise concepts of ideology. If, as Rorty once said of Brandom, his work "can usefully be seen as an attempt to usher analytic philosophy from its Kantian to its Hegelian stage," the question that now presses us is whether we can mobilize the resources of the Pittsburgh School to usher analytic philosophy from its Hegelian to its Marxist phase? Further, can Marxist thought gain insight into its own categories through an engagement with the thinking of Sellars, Brandom, McDowell, and related thinkers?
Following recent interest in the synergies and contradictions between these two traditions, we aim to build a dialogical space between Marxism and the Pittsburgh School.
VIEW & DOWNLOAD CONFERENCE SCHEDULE & ABSTRACTS
TO ATTEND, PLEASE VISIT OUR EVENTBRITE PAGE
IMAGE: Siah Armajani, Tomb for John Berryman, 1972–2012
"
Contemporary Art & the Peripheries" is a Conference in celebration of the 10th Anniversary of The New Centre for Research & Practice, to be held in Porto, Portugal, on October 4th and organized in partnership with ESAP (Escola Superior Artística do Porto). The event will feature talks and roundtables with Eduarda Neves, Joel Blanco & Miguel Leiro, Jordan Strom, Mohammad Salemy, Né Barros, Reza Negarestani, and Shaun Dacey.
This informal Conference gathers art practitioners and theorists who inhabit a peripheral place within the global contemporary art world, featuring representatives from Richmond Art Gallery, Surrey Art Gallery, Mayrit Biennial, and also from the local context of Porto. Each guest will bring together theoretical models with case studies and practical experiences.
Focused on the claim that "another art world is possible" and exploring the direction of art in the 21st century, the guests depart from two provocative metaphors: Reza Negarestani's Human Centipede and Eduarda Neves' Minor Bestiary: Time and Labyrinth in Contemporary Art. These works offer a lens through which we can better understand contemporary art's often exploitative dynamics and attempt to use philosophy to renew and reshape the field.
In Human Centipede, Negarestani uses the grotesque image of a human chain stitched together, each body part feeding and being fed upon by the next, to depict the functioning of art discourse as it moves from one institution and curator to another. In this vision, artists, curators, critics, and collectors feed from each other, forming a parasitic relationship where creative output is consumed, processed, and regurgitated to sustain the field. In Minor Bestiary, Eduarda Neves presents a labyrinthine view of contemporary art, where the act of interpretation and meaning-making becomes an endless maze with no end. Artists, critics, and audiences wander through this intellectual labyrinth, navigating complex institutional structures that often obscure rather than illuminate the artworks themselves. Neves argues that contemporary art has become self-referential, prioritizing the process of interpretation and accumulating economic value over genuine engagement with the work.
Taking these texts as conversation starters, the Conference mixes the implications of the authors' ideas with field reports from the geographic peripheries of contemporary art to map out the possible future outcomes for the art world.
Beyond merely discussing these issues, the participants will be actively seeking solutions. Can art break free from the cycles of discursive consumption and reinterpretation? Can it escape the system that recycles creativity for market value? We're envisioning a new art world where genuine innovation and autonomy are possible, free from the parasitic and labyrinthine structures currently defining it. And we're asking you, the artists, curators, and critics, to play a crucial role in shaping this future.
EDUARDA NEVES: Minor Bestiary
Minor Bestiary contributes to the debate on a few issues in the scope of contemporary art: the first part is entitled “Time and the novelty of impotence”; it is followed by “The labyrinth or why art it has no beginning” and, finally, in the form of a post-scriptum, “Ice – at the end of the world, it is the universe that dreams”, a text that reflects on the relationship between art and tourism, an initiative developed in Portugal, 2022, (PORTUGAL ART ENCOUNTERS— PARTE Summit)* with Portuguese artists and galleries associated with a certain international curatorial contemporary art mainstream. Synthesizing this with figures from literature and philosophy allowed me to draft an ideological x-ray of our time, one that provided me with the dominant traits of contemporary art: subservience to the authority of sponsorship, the aestheticization of social demands, exposure and activism tailored for Instagram, a libidinal capitalism that sustains the economy of art, heterotopia reduced to ambition, prestige and power.
REZA NEGARESTANI: The Zombie Children of Time: A View from a Recursive Artworld
Centered on an unhappy and unconscious relation of the art world at large with its own undetermined collaboration, critique, and ultimately servitude to the ongoing computational, technical, and financial loops. This presentation focuses on a valorization of art as a set of algorithms the nature of which remains epistemologically, ethically, politically and financially opaque.
JORDAN STROM: Bursting Pipedreams in Candyland: Expo 86’s Counter Exhibitions
The mid-1980s was a transformative moment in the history of Canada. The country, as with North America more broadly, had been undergoing massive socio-economic changes in the aftermath of the oil crisis of the mid 1970s and recession of the early 1980s. A wave of conservative political realignments had swept the nation, poverty and homelessness had risen, economic restructuring had led to massive layoffs in the public and private sectors. Meanwhile, in the City of Vancouver, the planning of an array of mega-spectacles to coincide with the city’s centenary in 1986—including Vancouver’s world’s fair, known as Expo 86—was drastically reshaping the city. Artists were at the forefront of responding to these dramatic changes. In the period between 1984 and 1987, a wide array of new arts collectives, artist-led institutions, art initiatives and projects were launched to address these challenges. Yet, despite this surge of art and cultural expression, the world’s fair, and the larger year of cultural production has resulted in very little art historical attention in the intervening year. The art of the Expo 86 era—how this art responded directly and indirectly to the symbolic and real material and structural effects of Vancouver’s world’s fair—and this time of enormous transition is the subject of this paper. I will examine a number of specific art projects that lay on the periphery of the fair and challenged its official programming and spectacular logic.
SHAUN DACEY: Pacific crossings
The Richmond Art Gallery (RAG), located on the outskirts of Vancouver, Canada, is building connections and fostering partnerships with artist collectives, institutions, and artists across Asia through a series of ongoing residencies and dialogues. Rather than focusing solely on the major art centers of the West, RAG is refocused on engaging with emergent art communities in the Philippines, Vietnam, Japan, and other Pacific regions. I will discuss how Richmond, one of Canada's most culturally diverse cities and home to the largest proportion of Asian residents in North America, has influenced the gallery to reposition its programming and dialogue to reflect better the community it serves.
JOEL BLANCO & MIGUEL LEIRO: Report from Mayrit Biennale of Artchitecture & Design
Here is a glimpse of our experience as the curatorial director of the Mayrit Biennial, I will present the case study about how this Madrid-based event exemplifies the potential of art institutions positioned on the peripheries of the global art world and responding to other biennials around the world. The Mayrit Biennial merges design, architecture, and contemporary art, serving as a platform for emerging talent and fostering creative experimentation outside the central nodes of the traditional art market, deploying a decentralized model, encouraging genuine engagement with the work, fostering community, and creating opportunities for new forms of collaboration.
//////////////
Together with ESAP (Escola Superior de Arte do Porto), we hosted a roundtable titled "ChatGPT, Language and The Future of Thinking & Writing" on June 2nd, from 16:00-18:00 CET. You can watch it through
this link.
ChatGPT and other developments in Large Language Models have taken the world by storm. Their profound and yet unformulated implications for thinking, reasoning and writing have sparked crucial debates on the transformation of human intellect and communication in our age. This roundtable explores the complex relationship between ChatGPT's emergence and the changes already underway in thinking and writing practices. This roundtable brings together: Elie Ayache, Joao Enxuto & Erica Love, AA Cavia, Joao Oliveira Duarte, Anna Longo, Rafael Moscardi, Reza Negatestani, Mohammad Salemy, and is Moderated by Romulo Moraes.
Featuring human-like text generation and comprehension capabilities, ChatGPT has found applications in a myriad of industries, from content creation to customer service. It also sparked a number of controversies for its usage on academic tasks such as writing, editing, and summarizing as well as uses in creative writing. As much as AI models have been instrumental in augmenting human intellect, they have also inherited the limitations and biases of the data they have been trained on. With that in mind, this roundtable asks: What are the limitations it reproduces? Are we on the brink of a new revolution in intellectual labor? What does ChatGPT say about our own capacity for reasoning in our predicament?
Below, you can find the abstracts from our participants:
Elie Ayache: ChatGPT cannot write, it can only predict text probabilistically and you know what I think of probability and prediction as opposed to writing. Definitely, some arguments from derivatives writing and trading should be brought to bear. Especially in relation with the future, whose awareness seems to be the necessary condition from AI to be capable of thought.
AA Cavia: AI as a research project has as its founding myth the notion that mimicry and intelligence are indistinguishable. What modes of artificial reason lie beyond the imitation game? I will argue for the centrality of the notion of a 'world model' in accounts of sapience.
João Oliveira Duarte: Our aim will be to address ChatGPT as a bodiless language from above as a particular example of Borges’s library: a place in which sense and nonsense, gibberish and meaningful sense, cannot be distinguished.
Joao Enxuto & Erica Love: We will discuss the uses and effects of deploying descriptors such as “dreaming” and “hallucinating” to generative AI and how these allusions to transcendental states confer (humanistic) artistic agency to computational processes.
Anna Longo: Based on statistical methods, chat GPT confirms opinions, perspectives, and knowledge that we have already rather than improving and differentiating them. Entailed by the strategy of the current industry for information production and consumption, it favorises the latter while reducing the space for actual "creativity" and dissent.
Rafael Moscardi: From the Jacquard Loom to the thermodynamic engine, from the computer to the database and now with ChatGPT and other LLMs, paradigmatic “machines” bring the demystification of a task and change the form and function of labor as such. Can we forecast where these developments are heading after the release of ChatGPT?
Reza Negarestani: ChatGPT is a logical continuation but also an exacerbation of the so-called arsenals of democracy. The focus will be on how ChatGPT can be seen via the emerging doctrine of weapon open system architectures where potentials for weaponization are developed in accordance with adversarial dynamics and threats which do not yet exist.
Mohammad Salemy: ChatGPT did not change the nature of thinking and writing, thinking and writing had already changed and this is precisely why ChatGPT emerged.
And Your Bird Can Sing: Computational Theatre & the After-Image of Social Media is a research-based collaborative project organized by The New Centre for Research & Practice and Michael Turner and Daniel Young. This project will produce a work of experimental cinema about social media in general, Twitter in particular.
The artistic problem arises from an interest in historical transitions between media systems that continue to be understood as a fossil record’s sedimentary layers despite a shift from analog to digital. If our brain is a screen, and media a consciousness that we endlessly scroll, are we not cinematic spectators in an electropedic gyre?
We are motivated by the formal and aesthetic problem of media and time: How would 20th-century cinema understand 21st-century social media? How does social media understand cinema? We want to be better informed on how we have been re-structured globally and locally through heightened conflict mediated by algorithms that feed on publicly-shared and emotionally-charged content. Is social media the primary site of social power?
Can an interest in the production of vernaculars stemming from absurdist uses of both language and visual culture through witticisms and memes provide much-needed psychic breaks from larger narratives that consider contemporary histories as echoes of a teleological past?
These and other questions will be tackled throughout the seven sessions of this Seminar Series, which will take place on Saturdays, February 18 and 25, and March 4, 11, 18, and 25, 2023, at 10 am PST / 7 pm CET. It will provide a casual and intimate space for propositions and discussions by the guests featuring ideas and examples of social media and experimental cinema, relating to their research interests. Confirmed guests are Julieta Aranda, Hossein Derakhsan, Ganaele Langlois, Anna Longo, Reza Negarestani, and Mohammad Salemy.
Participation in the seminar series is free. To attend, please complete this form, and we will contact you soon with instructions. This form will shortlist an audience that will have the opportunity of engaging with our Guests.
For this Conference, our guests have offered abstracts that comply with the 280 character limit, immersing themselves into the constraints and temporalities of Twitter and inquiring into its capacity to evoke different effects and convey knowledge.
ABSTRACTS AND SCHEDULE
Session 1,
Julieta Aranda, February 18
Cinema & social media organize our experiences of time and our desires in different trajectories. Concomitant with the disruption of Hollywood's old power dynamics, was Social Media able to usher in a new era of audience production, or is it the end of cinema as we know it?
Session 2, Hossein Derakhshan, February 25Presents a case study of two political imaginaries about protests in Iran, written on twitter between 2017-19, in a film script-style, creating pragmatic possibilities of resistance on the ground against anticipated real oppression.
Session 3, Anna Longo, March 4Twitter cannot fly. Assemblages of enunciation are products of desiring machines. Birds’ songs are expressions of territorial assemblages and movies express lines of flight. Twitter is a machine operating according to the capitalist regime of signs: can cinema teach it to fly?
Session 4, Ganaele Langlois, March 11Affect as misinformation. Misinformation provokes intense affects: anger, fear, but also detachment, among others. This Session is an invitation to look closely at the organization of affect in misinformation propagated through social media, and about the kinds of tools needed to create new modes of engaging through affect.
Session 5, Reza Negarestani, March 18"Affect Economy between brains and algorithms" aims to foreground the economy of affect in the age of social media through a synthesis between several theories of neuroscience, and a number of critical theories concerning algorithmic design and mass-entertainment.
Session 6, Roxanne Panchasi, March 25 Belgian musician Paul van Haver, aka "Stromae," is a deep-feels electro rapper/crooner & multimedia phenomenon. His 2013 song "Carmen," animated (literally) in the music video by Sylvain Chomet, is one of the most compelling visualizations of Twitter/social ever. Don't @ me.
IMAGE: Paul Klee, Twittering Machine (Die Zwitscher-Maschine), 1922, Detail.